Most professional-service firms are already using AI inside live workflows. Few have the governance structure, documentation standards, or review controls needed to defend how it is being used.
Complete Your Free Exposure Snapshot →The Exposure Surface
The risk is not that AI makes mistakes. The risk is that when AI-assisted work is questioned — by a client, opposing counsel, or a bar ethics inquiry — the firm cannot produce a documented record of what the tool did, who reviewed the output, and what was changed before delivery.
A vendor's SOC 2 certification describes the vendor's controls. It does not cover how your attorneys use the tool, what client data enters the system, how output is reviewed before it becomes a work product, or what happens when the output is wrong. That accountability structure is internal — and it does not exist at most firms.
GRID Control™ Framework
Every GRID Control™ Assessment is run against four controls that map a firm's AI governance posture. If any one of them fails, the work cannot be defended under scrutiny.
A written AI use policy that defines who is authorized, for which tasks, and who reviews AI-assisted output before it reaches a client.
A documented map of where AI operates across the firm — distinguishing assisted from autonomous and flagging exposure against existing liability structures.
Every AI tool embedded in a documented workflow with a named owner, a defined review point, and a clear operational boundary.
For every AI-assisted deliverable: the tool used, the input received, who reviewed the output, what changed, and final sign-off — on record. Aligned to ISO 42001.
"If it can't be explained, reviewed, and proven — it doesn't hold up."
When a Firm Cannot Explain Its AI Use
AI is already shaping drafting, research, analysis, and client communication. In most firms, that usage is informal, inconsistently reviewed, and poorly documented — until a client questions the work.
When AI-assisted work enters delivery without clear standards, quality control becomes inconsistent, rework increases, and the approval structure breaks down under any examination.
If the firm cannot show where AI is used, what tools are active, who reviewed the output, and what was approved — the firm is carrying unmanaged operational risk with no record to produce.
How Firms Enter the Architecture
A structured five-question instrument that surfaces your firm's current governance posture across the GRID pillars. Required to unlock the Discovery Call. Takes under four minutes.
A direct conversation about your firm's AI usage, current control environment, and whether the GRID Control™ Assessment is the right next instrument. Scheduled after the Snapshot.
Booking confirmation sent directly. No intake form on arrival — the Snapshot serves as your pre-call record.
The full four-pillar diagnostic. Delivered within 48 hours. Produces a written governance report mapped to your firm's actual AI usage, exposure points, and control gaps.
Firms that require ongoing controls, agent infrastructure, or ISO 42001 alignment proceed from the Assessment into the appropriate lane. All lanes are fixed-fee.
The Entry Point
The GRID Control™ Assessment is a fixed-fee, 48-hour diagnostic that evaluates a firm's AI governance posture across four controls: Governance, Risk, Integration, and Documentation.
The deliverable is a written report — not a slide deck, not a recommendation memo. A documented map of where AI operates in your firm, where controls are absent, and what governance architecture is required to defend the work.
Delivered directly by the Founder & Managing Partner. No subcontracting. No associates. Every assessment is executed to the same standard.
The Assessment is available only after the Exposure Snapshot and a confirmed Discovery Call. This is not a sales filter — it is a fit filter. The instrument requires accurate input to produce a defensible output.
The Entry Point Is the Snapshot
AI usage without controls is not strategy. It is exposure. The GRID Control™ Assessment produces the record that makes governance defensible.